ONLINE JOURNAL
- Vol.12 No.1
(2024) - Vol.11 No.2
(2023) - Vol.11 No.1
(2023) - Vol.10 No.2
(2022) - Vol.10 No.1
(2022) - Vol.9 No.2
(2021) - Vol.9 No.1
(2021) - Vol.8 No.2
(2020) - Vol.8 No.1
(2020) - Vol.7 No.1
(2019) - Vol.6 No.1
(2018) - Vol.5 No.1
(2017) - Vol.4 No.1
(2016) - Vol.3 No.1
(2015) - Vol.2 No.1
(2014) - Vol.1 No.1
(2013)
Vol.11 No.1
Note
Vol.11 No.1 pp.3-12
Current status and challenges of radiation protection/safety
education in hospitals: Analysis using the KJ method
1 Osaka Metropolitan University
2 Tokyo Healthcare University
3 Shonan Kamakura University of Medical Sciences
4 Tohto University
5 International University of Health and Welfare
6 The University of Tokyo
7 National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology
8 Kumamoto University
2 Tokyo Healthcare University
3 Shonan Kamakura University of Medical Sciences
4 Tohto University
5 International University of Health and Welfare
6 The University of Tokyo
7 National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology
8 Kumamoto University
Key words : radiation workers, radiation protection/safety education, status survey, KJ method
To identify challenges related to radiation worker education through a status survey, and formulate solutions.
A status survey was conducted, involving 1,883 hospitals with 200 or more beds throughout Japan, excluding those only providing psychiatric services, to collect their opinions about radiation worker education, including:
challenges in providing such education, educational approaches, and suggestions to resolve these challenges in a free-description style. The obtained data were analyzed using the KJ method. The current status and challenges were explained by 10 symbols: [recognition of the importance of education], [acute awareness of one’s role as the person in charge of education], [enthusiasm for education], [little interest in radiation protection/safety education among all employees, including the facility manager], [low participation rate of facility employees], [uncooperative
attitude of facility employees], [variations in topics learned in basic radiation education among professionals,resulting in differences in the level of understanding among them], [expansion of the role of the person in charge of education], [cooperation from the organization], and [support from related bodies]. The results revealed that persons in charge of radiation worker education are struggling alone, but it was thought that the driving force behind [expansion of the role of the person in charge of education], [cooperation from the organization] and [support from related bodies] would be to turn things around.